IMPORTANT MESSAGE REGARDING COVID-19

We work with whistleblowers to expose fraud against the government.

Billing Unallowable Costs

Defense contractors that bill unallowable costs, such as excessive executive compensation, to indirect cost pools used to bill overhead costs to government projects are stealing tax dollars.

Federal regulations exist for many reasons, one of which is to ensure that American taxpayer dollars are spent wisely. For this reason, defense contractors and other contractors doing business with the government are required to abide by regulations that govern their accounting practices with respect to the costs they bill the government.

Overhead costs, also called indirect costs, are one example. A portion of a company’s overhead, which includes such costs as office or plant space, and utilities, can be charged to the government as part of a contract as long as such allocations abide by federal rules.

But contractors sometimes violate these rules by billing unallowable costs as overhead, thus violating federal rules and overcharging the government under their contracts. In so doing, such contractors illegally profit at the expense of the American taxpayer.

To stop such abuses, whistleblowers with information of such illicit activities can file a False Claims Act lawsuit against the offending contractor. For helping to bring the wrongdoing to light, the whistleblower might receive a portion of the government’s recovery, as well.

Jacobs Engineering pays $35 million to resolve claims that it improperly charged overhead costs to the government

Jacobs Engineering in 2000 agreed to pay $35 million to settle claims that it improperly charged overhead costs to the government. The claims stem from a False Claims Act case  filed by a former employee. Jacobs was operating under “cost plus” contracts with the government, in which it was to allocate overhead, or non direct, costs pursuant to several regulations.

One of the regulations that Jacobs was required by law to follow provides that if a contractor sells property then leases it back, the most that it can charge the government for the overhead cost is what the company could have charged (mostly depreciation costs) had the contractor retained ownership.

Jacobs, the court found, did not abide by this regulation. Instead, Jacobs charged as overhead the amount of rent payable to the leasing company, which was much more than the amount of the building’s depreciation. The California federal judge who heard the case ruled that Jacobs thus violated the law. Before the judge ruled on the amount of damages that the contractor owed the government, Jacobs settled the case for $35 million.

Sverdrup Technology, Inc., pays $2.5 million to settle allegations of mischarging NASA

Sverdrup Technology, Inc., a government contractor based in Tullahoma, Tennessee, in 2001 settled a False Claims Act lawsuit with the federal government for $2.5 million. The lawsuit stemmed from allegations that the company mischarged the National Aeronautics  and Space Administration (NASA) for overhead costs related to two laboratories owned by the company. Sverdrup Technology is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Jacobs Engineering Group.

The allegations stem from a technical services contract between NASA and the company in the early to mid-1990s, in which the government charged that Sverdrup engaged in mischarging practices carried out by two laboratories it operated at the Stennis Space Center in Hancock, Mississippi. The case was filed in federal court in Mississippi.

The court found that in the case of one of the laboratories, the company violated the False Claims Act by mischarging overhead labor and materials costs as direct costs, allowing the company to increase its profits by concealing the extent of its true overhead expenses. The company subsequently settled the claims relating to this laboratory as well as the second laboratory, for which it faced trial for similar allegations.

The case was originally pursued by a chemist and former employee of the company at Stennis Space Center. The whistleblower was awarded $150,000 of the settlement for his  role in the case.

Whistleblowers who bring False Claims Act cases can help prevent contractors from getting away with such fraud on the government. Individuals with knowledge of defense contractors that improperly misallocate costs to overhead in violation of federal law can help stop such fraud by filing False Claims Act cases.

Whistleblowers who expose such wrongdoing help to maintain the integrity of the U.S. government’s defense efforts and prevent companies from illegally profiting at the expense of taxpayers.

How Waters Kraus & Paul can help whistleblowers

With a national presence and in-depth experience fighting fraud against the government, Waters Kraus & Paul, LLP, provides aggressive representation of whistleblowers in qui tam actions and related complaints. The firm currently represents whistleblowers seeking to recover funds on behalf of the federal and state governments in a variety of cases, which may involve defendants such as large pharmaceutical companies, government contractors, school district contractors, and hospice and nursing home care providers.

To learn more about qui tam representation at Waters Kraus & Paul, or to have one of our attorneys review your potential case, email us or call 800.226.9880.

What is Qui Tam?

Under the Federal False Claims Act (FCA), whistleblowers have the power to save taxpayers billions of dollars each year by taking a stand against fraud. The U.S. False Claims Act allows private citizens to file suits on the government’s behalf when the government has been defrauded through any federally funded contract or program. The qui tam provisions of the False Claims Act allow these citizens to recover damages. A number of states and the city of Chicago also have laws similar to the False Claims Act to protect against fraud. To learn more about the different types of fraud … READ MORE

Coverage of Fluoride Lawsuit in California

June 25, 2020 Waters Kraus & Paul represents plaintiffs in a California fluoride case against the U.S. EPA in one of the first remote trials in the country. Waters Kraus & Paul attorney, Michael Connett and firm partner C. Andrew Waters, wrapped up a…
asbestos

Firm Partner Gary Paul Named on 2020 The Best Lawyers in America © List

June 23, 2020 Gary Paul, a name partner of Waters Kraus & Paul has been recognized in the 27th edition of The Best Lawyers in America© for his West Coast practice in plaintiff’s personal injury litigation. Mr. Paul’s distinguished experience as a trial lawyer of more than four decades has earned him this distinction numerous times. The publication’s methodology for selection is based entirely on the peer review of leading lawyers in the same geographical and legal practice area. About Gary Paul  Mr. Paul’s skill in complex civil matters such as consumer product liability, medical and professional malpractice, as well as commercial and…

What are my chances?

That’s the first question everyone asks. The truth is it’s impossible to know. But we can tell you this. Waters Kraus & Paul has what it takes to fight against big corporate interests and win. That’s why we’ve taken more mesothelioma trials to verdict than any other firm. And that’s why we’ve recovered more than $1.3 billion for clients like you. Do you think you have a case? Contact us now to speak with an attorney.

Call 800.226.9880